[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190626080605.GH3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:06:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Landden <shawn@....icu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:12:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:18:46AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can it build a kernel without patches yet? That is, why should I care
> > what LLVM does?
>
> Yes. LLVM trunk builds and boots x86 now. As for distro availability,
If it's not release and not in distros, then no. So then get that same
trunk to support the __fallthrough crap so it all lands in the same
release and we done ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists