[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190626085846.ax277ojvyp5k3abt@salvia>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:46 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: Allow parsing ETHER_FLOW types
when using flow_rule
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> When parsing an ethtool_rx_flow_spec, users can specify an ethernet flow
> which could contain matches based on the ethernet header, such as the
> MAC address, the VLAN tag or the ethertype.
>
> Only the ethtype field is specific to the ether flow, the MAC and vlan
> fields are processed using the special FLOW_EXT and FLOW_MAC_EXT flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> ---
> net/core/ethtool.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index 4d1011b2e24f..01ceba556341 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -2883,6 +2883,18 @@ ethtool_rx_flow_rule_create(const struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec_input *input)
> match->mask.basic.n_proto = htons(0xffff);
>
> switch (fs->flow_type & ~(FLOW_EXT | FLOW_MAC_EXT | FLOW_RSS)) {
> + case ETHER_FLOW: {
> + const struct ethhdr *ether_spec, *ether_m_spec;
> +
> + ether_spec = &fs->h_u.ether_spec;
> + ether_m_spec = &fs->m_u.ether_spec;
> +
> + if (ether_m_spec->h_proto) {
> + match->key.basic.n_proto = ether_spec->h_proto;
> + match->mask.basic.n_proto = ether_m_spec->h_proto;
> + }
I see some drivers in the tree also interpret the h_source and h_dest
fields?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon/ethtool.c#L1182
Probably good to address this in this patch too?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists