| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190626091409.47637-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:14:09 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, will.deacon@....com,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix exclusive events' grouping
So far, we tried to disallow grouping exclusive events for the fear of
complications they would cause with moving between contexts. Specifically,
moving a software group to a hardware context would violate the exclusivity
rules if both groups contain matching exclusive events.
This attempt was, however, unsuccessful: the check that we have in the
perf_event_open() syscall is both wrong (looks at wrong PMU) and
insufficient (group leader may still be exclusive), as can be illustrated
by running
$ perf record -e '{intel_pt//,cycles}' uname
$ perf record -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' uname
ultimately successfully.
Furthermore, we are completely free to trigger the exclusivity violation
by -e '{cycles,intel_pt//}' -e '{intel_pt//,instructions}', even though
the helpful perf record will not allow that, the ABI will. The warning
later in the perf_event_open() path will also not trigger, because it's
also wrong.
Fix all this by validating the original group before moving, getting rid
of broken safeguards and placing a useful one to perf_install_in_context().
And while at it, place exclusive events on their own list to avoid
iterating through all events.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Fixes: bed5b25ad9c8a ("perf: Add a pmu capability for "exclusive" events")
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 12 +++++++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 2ddae518dce6..3fdb5cbd22ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -574,6 +574,12 @@ struct perf_event {
*/
struct list_head sibling_list;
struct list_head active_list;
+
+ /*
+ * Link to ctx::exclusive_list
+ */
+ struct list_head exclusive_entry;
+
/*
* Node on the pinned or flexible tree located at the event context;
*/
@@ -739,6 +745,7 @@ struct perf_event_context {
struct perf_event_groups pinned_groups;
struct perf_event_groups flexible_groups;
struct list_head event_list;
+ struct list_head exclusive_list;
struct list_head pinned_active;
struct list_head flexible_active;
@@ -1054,6 +1061,11 @@ static inline int in_software_context(struct perf_event *event)
return event->ctx->pmu->task_ctx_nr == perf_sw_context;
}
+static inline int is_exclusive_pmu(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+ return pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE;
+}
+
extern struct static_key perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX];
extern void ___perf_sw_event(u32, u64, struct pt_regs *, u64);
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 23efe6792abc..7a159af28206 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1688,6 +1688,8 @@ list_add_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
if (event->attr.inherit_stat)
ctx->nr_stat++;
+ if (is_exclusive_pmu(event->pmu))
+ list_add_rcu(&event->exclusive_entry, &ctx->exclusive_list);
ctx->generation++;
}
@@ -1871,6 +1873,9 @@ list_del_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
list_del_rcu(&event->event_entry);
+ if (is_exclusive_pmu(event->pmu))
+ list_del_rcu(&event->exclusive_entry);
+
if (event->group_leader == event)
del_event_from_groups(event, ctx);
@@ -2553,6 +2558,9 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
return ret;
}
+static bool exclusive_event_installable(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx);
+
/*
* Attach a performance event to a context.
*
@@ -2567,6 +2575,8 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx));
+
if (event->cpu != -1)
event->cpu = cpu;
@@ -4071,6 +4081,7 @@ static void __perf_event_init_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->event_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->pinned_active);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->flexible_active);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->exclusive_list);
refcount_set(&ctx->refcount, 1);
}
@@ -4360,7 +4371,7 @@ static int exclusive_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu;
- if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE))
+ if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu))
return 0;
/*
@@ -4391,7 +4402,7 @@ static void exclusive_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu;
- if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE))
+ if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu))
return;
/* see comment in exclusive_event_init() */
@@ -4411,17 +4422,18 @@ static bool exclusive_event_match(struct perf_event *e1, struct perf_event *e2)
return false;
}
-/* Called under the same ctx::mutex as perf_install_in_context() */
static bool exclusive_event_installable(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
struct perf_event *iter_event;
struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu;
- if (!(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE))
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
+
+ if (!is_exclusive_pmu(pmu))
return true;
- list_for_each_entry(iter_event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
+ list_for_each_entry(iter_event, &ctx->exclusive_list, exclusive_entry) {
if (exclusive_event_match(iter_event, event))
return false;
}
@@ -10917,11 +10929,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
goto err_alloc;
}
- if ((pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE) && group_leader) {
- err = -EBUSY;
- goto err_context;
- }
-
/*
* Look up the group leader (we will attach this event to it):
*/
@@ -11009,6 +11016,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
move_group = 0;
}
}
+
+ /*
+ * Failure to create exclusive events returns -EBUSY.
+ */
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ if (!exclusive_event_installable(group_leader, ctx))
+ goto err_locked;
+
+ for_each_sibling_event(sibling, group_leader)
+ if (!exclusive_event_installable(sibling, ctx))
+ goto err_locked;
} else {
mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
}
@@ -11045,9 +11063,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
* because we need to serialize with concurrent event creation.
*/
if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)) {
- /* exclusive and group stuff are assumed mutually exclusive */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(move_group);
-
err = -EBUSY;
goto err_locked;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists