linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] staging: erofs: remove unsupported ->datamode check in fill_inline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:51:55 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To:     Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>, <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <huyue2@...ong.com>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] staging: erofs: remove unsupported ->datamode
 check in fill_inline_data()

Hi Yue,

On 2019/6/26 18:39, Yue Hu wrote:
> From: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
> 
> Already check if ->datamode is supported in read_inode(), no need to check
> again in the next fill_inline_data() only called by fill_inode().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Bump the patch version in the title as Greg said...
Otherwise, it is hard to differ which patch is the latest patch...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> ---
>  drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
> index e51348f..d6e1e16 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
> @@ -129,8 +129,6 @@ static int fill_inline_data(struct inode *inode, void *data,
>  	struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_I_SB(inode);
>  	const int mode = vi->datamode;
>  
> -	DBG_BUGON(mode >= EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_MAX);
> -
>  	/* should be inode inline C */
>  	if (mode != EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_INLINE)
>  		return 0;
>