linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: convert to raw_spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190626141819.GV657710@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 07:18:19 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: convert to raw_spinlock_t

Hello,

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:12:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We are working hard to get the remaining pieces in and to the best of my
> knowledge there is no hard resistance against merging them.

I wonder whether it'd be useful to build some consensus around the
approach.  It'd be a lot easier for everyone involved than having the
same conversation repeatedly.  What do you think?

> What we are trying at the moment is to reduce the surface of the bulk of RT
> changes and get the 'innocent' ones in. If you feel more comfortable, then
> we can surely redo the series and pick 1,2,6 for now and keep 3-5 for the
> final submission.

Yeah, that sounds good.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun