linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] remove arch/sh?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf3c3583-2b6c-8c45-a37f-357aca8ee80c@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:56:12 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove arch/sh?

On 6/26/19 5:38 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> Maybe everything but J2 and SH4(a) can just get retired?
>>>
>>>      Arnd
>>
>> I also have some boards, so it's possible to rewrite more.
>> I can not rewrite the target I do not have, so I think that
>> there is nothing but to retire.
> 
> To clarify, are you agreeing with Arnd's suggestion to retire/remove
> everything but jcore and sh4[a]?

I would keep J-Core, SH3 and SH4[a]. SH5 can go in any case since there
is no hardware available and gcc has no longer support for the target
either.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913