lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:01:49 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        David Howells <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (task_struct: cached_requested_key)

On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> Changes since 20190625:
> The keys tree gained conflicts aginst the ecryptfs and integrity trees.

Multiple build errors like this when CONFIG_KEYS is not set/enabled:
(this was seen on one i386 build)

# CONFIG_KEYS is not set

  CC      arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul_glue.o
In file included from ../include/linux/export.h:45:0,
                 from ../include/linux/linkage.h:7,
                 from ../include/linux/kernel.h:8,
                 from ../arch/x86/entry/common.c:10:
../include/linux/tracehook.h: In function ‘tracehook_notify_resume’:
../include/linux/tracehook.h:191:22: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘cached_requested_key’
  if (unlikely(current->cached_requested_key)) {


Powered by blists - more mailing lists