lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLxrwkgHY6sg98NVfAsG3EYeJLxAevskOUdB=gNQugfSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:05:43 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, c0d1n61at3@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] packet: Fix undefined behavior
 in bit shift

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/27/19 10:22 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:32:52 -0600
> >
> >> On 6/26/19 9:25 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
> >>> Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined.  Changing most
> >>> significant bit to unsigned.
> >>> Changes included in v2:
> >>>     - use subsystem specific subject lines
> >>>     - CC required mailing lists
> >>>
> >>
> >> These version change lines don't belong in the change log.
> >
> > For networking changes I actually like the change lines to be in the
> > commit log.  So please don't stray people this way, thanks.
> >
>
> As a general rule, please don't include change lines in the commit log.
> For networking changes that get sent to David and netdev, as David
> points out here, he likes them in the commit log, please include them
> in the commit log.
>
> I am working on FAQ (Frequently Answered Questions) section for mentees.
> I will add this to it.

Same for bpf trees.
We prefer developers put as much as info as possible into commit logs
and cover letters.
Explanation of v1->v2->v3 differences is invaluable not only at
the point of code review, but in the future.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ