linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 18/22] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Optimize CPUFreq notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190627211115.21138-19-digetx@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:11:11 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 18/22] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Optimize CPUFreq notifier

When CPU's memory activity is low or memory activity is high such that
CPU's frequency contribution to the boosting is not taken into account,
then there is no need to schedule devfreq's update. This eliminates
unnecessary CPU activity during of idling caused by the scheduled work.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
index c1ab7af07daa..e8f7cc56a340 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
@@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ static inline unsigned long do_percent(unsigned long val, unsigned int pct)
 	return val * pct / 100;
 }
 
-static unsigned long actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
+static unsigned long actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
+					    unsigned int cpu_freq)
 {
 	const struct tegra_actmon_emc_ratio *ratio = actmon_emc_ratios;
-	unsigned int cpu_freq = cpufreq_get(0);
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_emc_ratios); i++, ratio++) {
@@ -239,15 +239,15 @@ tegra_actmon_account_cpu_freq(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
 			      struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev,
 			      unsigned long target_freq)
 {
-	unsigned long static_cpu_emc_freq;
+	unsigned long cpu_emc_freq = 0;
 
-	if (dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold &&
-	    dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold < dev->avg_freq) {
-		static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra);
-		target_freq = max(target_freq, static_cpu_emc_freq);
-	}
+	if (!dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+		return target_freq;
 
-	return target_freq;
+	if (dev->avg_freq > dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+		cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpufreq_get(0));
+
+	return max(target_freq, cpu_emc_freq);
 }
 
 static unsigned long tegra_actmon_lower_freq(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
@@ -530,16 +530,71 @@ static void tegra_actmon_delayed_update(struct work_struct *work)
 	mutex_unlock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
 }
 
+static unsigned long
+tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
+				  unsigned int cpu_freq)
+{
+	unsigned long freq, static_cpu_emc_freq;
+
+	/* check whether CPU's freq is taken into account at all */
+	if (tegra->devices[MCCPU].avg_freq <=
+	    tegra->devices[MCCPU].config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+		return 0;
+
+	static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpu_freq);
+
+	/* compare static CPU-EMC freq with MCALL */
+	freq = tegra->devices[MCALL].avg_freq +
+	       tegra->devices[MCALL].boost_freq;
+
+	freq = tegra_actmon_upper_freq(tegra, freq);
+
+	if (freq == tegra->max_freq || freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* compare static CPU-EMC freq with MCCPU */
+	freq = tegra->devices[MCCPU].avg_freq +
+	       tegra->devices[MCCPU].boost_freq;
+
+	freq = tegra_actmon_upper_freq(tegra, freq);
+
+	if (freq == tegra->max_freq || freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
+		return 0;
+
+	return static_cpu_emc_freq;
+}
+
 static int tegra_actmon_cpu_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				      unsigned long action, void *ptr)
 {
+	struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs = ptr;
 	struct tegra_devfreq *tegra;
+	unsigned long old, new;
 
 	if (action != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
 
 	tegra = container_of(nb, struct tegra_devfreq, cpu_rate_change_nb);
 
+	/*
+	 * Quickly check whether CPU frequency should be taken into account
+	 * at all, without blocking CPUFreq's core.
+	 */
+	if (mutex_trylock(&tegra->devfreq->lock)) {
+		old = tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(tegra, freqs->old);
+		new = tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(tegra, freqs->new);
+		mutex_unlock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
+
+		/*
+		 * If CPU's frequency shouldn't be taken into account at
+		 * the moment, then there is no need to update the devfreq's
+		 * state because ISR will re-check CPU's frequency on the
+		 * next interrupt.
+		 */
+		if (old == new)
+			return NOTIFY_OK;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * CPUFreq driver should support CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION in order
 	 * to allow asynchronous notifications. This means we can't block
-- 
2.22.0