[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AF233D1473C1364ABD51D28909A1B1B75C19070D@pgsmsx114.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:08:21 +0000
From: "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Giuseppe Cavallaro" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC net-next 1/5] net: stmmac: introduce IEEE 802.1Qbv
configuration functionalities
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jose Abreu [mailto:Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com]
>>From: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dw_tsn_lib.c
>b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dw_tsn_lib.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..cba27c604cb1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dw_tsn_lib.c
>
>XGMAC also supports TSN features so I think more abstraction is needed
>on this because the XGMAC implementation is very similar (only reg
>offsets and bitfields changes).
>
>I would rather:
> - Implement HW specific handling in dwmac4_core.c / dwmac4_dma.c
>and
>add the callbacks in hwif table;
> - Let TSN logic in this file but call it stmmac_tsn.c.
OK. Thanks for above feedback.
>
>> @@ -3621,6 +3622,8 @@ static int stmmac_set_features(struct net_device
>*netdev,
>> */
>> stmmac_rx_ipc(priv, priv->hw);
>>
>> + netdev->features = features;
>
>Isn't this a fix ?
Yup. We will split this out as a patch and send separately.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists