[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190627234149.GA212823@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:41:50 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Jaskaran Khurana <jaskarankhurana@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, jmorris@...ei.org, scottsh@...rosoft.com,
mpatocka@...hat.com, gmazyland@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/1] Add dm verity root hash pkcs7 sig validation.
Hi Jaskaran, one comment (I haven't reviewed this in detail):
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:10:48PM -0700, Jaskaran Khurana wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig
> index db269a348b20..2d658a3512cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig
> @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ config DM_VERITY
> select CRYPTO
> select CRYPTO_HASH
> select DM_BUFIO
> + select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
> ---help---
> This device-mapper target creates a read-only device that
> transparently validates the data on one underlying device against
> diff --git a/drivers/md/Makefile b/drivers/md/Makefile
> index be7a6eb92abc..3b47b256b15e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/md/Makefile
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ dm-cache-y += dm-cache-target.o dm-cache-metadata.o dm-cache-policy.o \
> dm-cache-background-tracker.o
> dm-cache-smq-y += dm-cache-policy-smq.o
> dm-era-y += dm-era-target.o
> -dm-verity-y += dm-verity-target.o
> +dm-verity-y += dm-verity-target.o dm-verity-verify-sig.o
> md-mod-y += md.o md-bitmap.o
> raid456-y += raid5.o raid5-cache.o raid5-ppl.o
> dm-zoned-y += dm-zoned-target.o dm-zoned-metadata.o dm-zoned-reclaim.o
Perhaps this should be made optional and controlled by a kconfig option
CONFIG_DM_VERITY_SIGNATURE_VERIFICATION, similar to CONFIG_DM_VERITY_FEC?
CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION brings in a lot of stuff, which might be
unnecessary for some dm-verity users. Also, you've already separated most of
the code out into a separate .c file anyway.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists