linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] bpf: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+hZvNEx6pjWKEomn=Nh8zM1451kVscvCyyWaJ-DmcehA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:22:48 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] bpf: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF code

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:07 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 05:57:08PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Objtool previously ignored ___bpf_prog_run() because it didn't
> > > understand the jump table.  This resulted in the ORC unwinder not being
> > > able to unwind through non-JIT BPF code.
> > >
> > > Now that objtool knows how to read jump tables, remove the whitelist and
> > > rename the variable to "jump_table" so objtool can recognize it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d15d356887e7 ("perf/x86: Make perf callchains work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER")
> > > Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 ++---
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > index 080e2bb644cc..ff66294882f8 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > @@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
> > >  {
> > >  #define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y)    [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y
> > >  #define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z
> > > -       static const void *jumptable[256] = {
> > > +       static const void *jump_table[256] = {
> > >                 [0 ... 255] = &&default_label,
> > >                 /* Now overwrite non-defaults ... */
> > >                 BPF_INSN_MAP(BPF_INSN_2_LBL, BPF_INSN_3_LBL),
> > > @@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
> > >  #define CONT_JMP ({ insn++; goto select_insn; })
> > >
> > >  select_insn:
> > > -       goto *jumptable[insn->code];
> > > +       goto *jump_table[insn->code];
> >
> > I thought we were clear that it is a nack?
> > Either live it alone or rename to something like jump_table_bpf_interpreter
> > or bpf_interpreter_jump_table.
>
> As I have said many times:
>
> The jump table detection is a generic objtool feature.  It makes no
> sense to give a bpf-specific name to a generic objtool feature which can
> be used by other components.

Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>