linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 1/4] ARM: defconfig: Samsung/Exynos for v5.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190627022842.k4gccn6enqd75ufs@localhost>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:28:42 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arm@...nel.org,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/4] ARM: defconfig: Samsung/Exynos for v5.3

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:14:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 21:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9:
> >
> >   Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-defconfig-5.3
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to dd50a69b5697532666023766688c6ea642e5a443:
> >
> >   ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable Panfrost and Lima drivers (2019-06-19 19:23:35 +0200)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Samsung defconfig changes for v5.3
> >
> > 1. Trim several configs with savedefconfig.
> > 2. Enable Lima and Panfrost drivers for Mali GPU.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I forgot to mention possible merge conflicts (although Stephen Cc-ed
> you on mails). Resolution is to accept both sides:
> 

Some of this could have been avoided by basing your branch on our fixes, but
not a big deal in this case. Thanks for the heads up!


-Olof