lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:32:30 +0930 From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au> To: "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, "Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, "OpenBMC Maillist" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: aspeed: Split bindings document in two On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, at 13:02, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 07:15, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote: > > > > Have one for each of the AST2400 and AST2500. The only thing that was > > common was the fact that both support ASPEED BMC SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> > > --- > > .../pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt | 80 +++++++++++++++++++ > > ...-aspeed.txt => aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.txt} | 63 ++------------- > > 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt > > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/{pinctrl-aspeed.txt => aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.txt} (66%) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..67e0325ccf2e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ > > +============================= > > +Aspeed AST2400 Pin Controller > > +============================= > > + > > +Required properties for the AST2400: > > +- compatible : Should be one of the following: > > + "aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl" > > + "aspeed,g4-pinctrl" > > + > > +The pin controller node should be the child of a syscon node with the required > > +property: > > + > > +- compatible : Should be one of the following: > > + "aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd" > > + "aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd" > > I think we can use this as an opportunity to drop the unused g4-scu > compatible from the bindings. Similarly for the g5. I Wonder if we should eradicate that pattern for all the aspeed compatibles? > > Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> Cheers, Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists