linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190627140929.74ae7da6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:09:29 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com>,
        Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c

between commits:

  955858009708 ("net/mlx5e: Fix number of vports for ingress ACL configuration")
  d4a18e16c570 ("net/mlx5e: Enable setting multiple match criteria for flow group")

from the net-next tree and commits:

  7445cfb1169c ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Tag packet with vport number in VF vports and uplink ingress ACLs")
  c01cfd0f1115 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add match on vport metadata for rule in fast path")

from the mlx5-next tree.

I fixed it up (I basically used the latter versions) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped