[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190627045052.GA7594@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:50:52 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Cristina Moraru <cristina.moraru09@...il.com>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
backports@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Daniel Jonsson <danijons@...dent.chalmers.se>,
Andrzej Wasowski <wasowski@....dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add CONFIG symbol as module attribute
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 03:21:08PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:07 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> > In lieu of no Luke Skywalker, if you will, for a large kconfig revamp
> > on this, I'm inclined to believe *at least* having some kconfig_symb
> > exposed for some modules is better than nothing. Christoph are you
> > totally opposed to this effort until we get a non-reverse engineered
> > effort in place? It just seems like an extraordinary amount of work
> > and I'm not quite sure who's volunteering to do it.
> >
> > Other stakeholders may benefit from at least having some config -->
> > module mapping for now. Not just backports or building slimmer
> > kernels.
>
> Christoph, *poke*
Yes, I'm still totally opposed to a half-backed hack like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists