[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1906271423070.16512@namei.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:59:09 +1000 (AEST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>
cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V34 09/29] kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel
is locked down
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
>
> When KEXEC_SIG is not enabled, kernel should not load images through
> kexec_file systemcall if the kernel is locked down.
This is not a criticism of the patch but a related issue which I haven't
seen discussed (apologies if it has).
If signed code is loaded into ring 0, verified by the kernel, then
executed, you still lose your secure/trusted/verified boot state. If the
currently running kernel has been runtime-compromised, any signature
verification performed by the kernel cannot be trusted.
This problem is out of scope for the lockdown threat model (which
naturally cannot include a compromised kernel), but folk should be aware
that signature-verified kexec does not provide equivalent assurance to a
full reboot on a secure-boot system.
Potential mitigations here include runtime integrity verification of the
kernel via a separate security monitor (hypervisor, SMM, TEE etc.) or some
kind of platform support for kexec verification.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists