linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 11/17] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c53ec41a1cdf668f3d849c2177fff3098347fbb.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:22:28 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/17] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST_CTL

On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 14:11 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> > On 6/27/2019 3:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The real interesting question is whether the #AC on split lock prevents
> > > the
> > > actual bus lock or not. If it does then the above is fine.
> > > 
> > > If not, then it would be trivial for a malicious guest to set the
> > > SPLIT_LOCK_ENABLE bit and "handle" the exception pro forma, return to the
> > > offending instruction and trigger another one. It lowers the rate, but
> > > that
> > > doesn't make it any better.
> > > 
> > > The SDM is as usual too vague to be useful. Please clarify.
> > > 
> > 
> > This feature is to ensure no bus lock (due to split lock) in hardware, that
> > to
> > say, when bit 29 of TEST_CTL is set, there is no bus lock due to split lock
> > can be acquired.
> 
> So enabling this prevents the bus lock, i.e. the exception is raised before
> that happens.
> 
exactly.

> Please add that information to the changelog as well because that's
> important to know and makes me much more comfortable handing the #AC back
> into the guest when it has it enabled.
> 
Will add it in next version.

Thanks.