[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26a4597e-3881-73a2-07e3-6171ddd15d51@allwinnertech.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:51:05 +0800
From: liaoweixiong <liaoweixiong@...winnertech.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] mtd: spinand: read return badly if the last
page has bitflips
Hi Miquel,
On 2019/6/28 AM2:17, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote on Thu, 27 Jun 2019
> 19:06:44 +0200:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de> wrote on Tue, 25 Jun
>> 2019 07:04:06 +0000:
>>
>>> Hi liaoweixiong,
>>>
>>> On 25.06.19 05:08, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:02:29AM +0800, liaoweixiong wrote:
>>>>> In case of the last page containing bitflips (ret > 0),
>>>>> spinand_mtd_read() will return that number of bitflips for the last
>>>>> page. But to me it looks like it should instead return max_bitflips like
>>>>> it does when the last page read returns with 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: liaoweixiong <liaoweixiong@...winnertech.com>
>>
>> Please write your entire official first/last name(s)
>>
OK.
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>>
>> I am waiting your next version with Acked-by instead of Rewieved-by
>> tags and Greg's comment addressed.
>
> Sorry for the mistake, R-b tags are fine here, don't touch that.
> The rest needs to be fixed though.
>
OK.
>>>>> Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs")
>>
>> Finally, when we ask you to resend a patch, it means sending a new
>> version of the patch. So in the subject, you should not use the
>> [RESEND] keyword (which means you are sending something again exactly
>> as it was before, you just got ignored, for example) but instead you
>> should increment the version number (v3) and also write a nice
>> changelog after the three dashes '---' (will be ignored by Git when
>> applying).
>>
>> I would like to queue this for the next release so if you can do it
>> ASAP, that would be great.
>>
I will do it right now.
>> Thank you,
>> Miquèl
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
--
liaoweixiong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists