linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5] mm/gup: speed up check_and_migrate_cma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFgQCTsO6WOef1v69J3+Vx-AuU8pPVeJSTjrf04VQum=YXEk2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:59:29 +0800
From:   Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux-mm@...ck.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] mm/gup: speed up check_and_migrate_cma_pages() on huge page

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 7:25 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:15:45 +0800 Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Both hugetlb and thp locate on the same migration type of pageblock, since
> > they are allocated from a free_list[]. Based on this fact, it is enough to
> > check on a single subpage to decide the migration type of the whole huge
> > page. By this way, it saves (2M/4K - 1) times loop for pmd_huge on x86,
> > similar on other archs.
> >
> > Furthermore, when executing isolate_huge_page(), it avoid taking global
> > hugetlb_lock many times, and meanless remove/add to the local link list
> > cma_page_list.
> >
>
> Thanks, looks good to me.  Have any timing measurements been taken?
Not yet. It is a little hard to force huge page to be allocated CMA
area. Should I provide the measurements?
>
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -1336,25 +1336,30 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk,
> >                                       struct vm_area_struct **vmas,
> >                                       unsigned int gup_flags)
> >  {
> > -     long i;
> > +     long i, step;
>
> I'll make these variables unsigned long - to match nr_pages and because
> we have no need for them to be negative.
OK, will fix it.

Thanks,
  Pingfan
>
> > ...