[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190628080618.522-8-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:06:17 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
tj@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
claudio@...dence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it,
bristot@...hat.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 7/8] sched/core: Prevent race condition between cpuset and __sched_setscheduler()
No synchronisation mechanism exists between the cpuset subsystem and
calls to function __sched_setscheduler(). As such, it is possible that
new root domains are created on the cpuset side while a deadline
acceptance test is carried out in __sched_setscheduler(), leading to a
potential oversell of CPU bandwidth.
Grab cpuset_rwsem read lock from core scheduler, so to prevent
situations such as the one described above from happening.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
---
v7->v8: use a percpu_rwsem read lock to avoid hotpath bottleneck issues
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 5 +++++
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 7f1478c26a33..04c20de66afc 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ extern void cpuset_init_smp(void);
extern void cpuset_force_rebuild(void);
extern void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void);
extern void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void);
+extern void cpuset_read_lock(void);
+extern void cpuset_read_unlock(void);
extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *mask);
extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p);
extern nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
@@ -176,6 +178,9 @@ static inline void cpuset_update_active_cpus(void)
static inline void cpuset_wait_for_hotplug(void) { }
+static inline void cpuset_read_lock(void) { }
+static inline void cpuset_read_unlock(void) { }
+
static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
struct cpumask *mask)
{
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d92b351f89e3..f47b5c5c3c8b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -334,6 +334,17 @@ static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
*/
DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(cpuset_rwsem);
+
+void cpuset_read_lock(void)
+{
+ percpu_down_read(&cpuset_rwsem);
+}
+
+void cpuset_read_unlock(void)
+{
+ percpu_up_read(&cpuset_rwsem);
+}
+
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(callback_lock);
static struct workqueue_struct *cpuset_migrate_mm_wq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index acd6a9fe85bc..18e151c6b48d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4208,6 +4208,9 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
return retval;
}
+ if (pi)
+ cpuset_read_lock();
+
/*
* Make sure no PI-waiters arrive (or leave) while we are
* changing the priority of the task:
@@ -4280,6 +4283,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
if (unlikely(oldpolicy != -1 && oldpolicy != p->policy)) {
policy = oldpolicy = -1;
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
+ if (pi)
+ cpuset_read_unlock();
goto recheck;
}
@@ -4338,8 +4343,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
preempt_disable();
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
- if (pi)
+ if (pi) {
+ cpuset_read_unlock();
rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p);
+ }
/* Run balance callbacks after we've adjusted the PI chain: */
balance_callback(rq);
@@ -4349,6 +4356,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
unlock:
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
+ if (pi)
+ cpuset_read_unlock();
return retval;
}
@@ -4433,10 +4442,15 @@ do_sched_setscheduler(pid_t pid, int policy, struct sched_param __user *param)
rcu_read_lock();
retval = -ESRCH;
p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
- if (p != NULL)
- retval = sched_setscheduler(p, policy, &lparam);
+ if (!p) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ get_task_struct(p);
rcu_read_unlock();
-
+ retval = sched_setscheduler(p, policy, &lparam);
+ put_task_struct(p);
+exit:
return retval;
}
@@ -4564,10 +4578,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
rcu_read_lock();
retval = -ESRCH;
p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
- if (p != NULL)
- retval = sched_setattr(p, &attr);
+ if (!p) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ get_task_struct(p);
rcu_read_unlock();
-
+ retval = sched_setattr(p, &attr);
+ put_task_struct(p);
+exit:
return retval;
}
--
2.17.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists