[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190628083227.GA21661@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:32:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 26/29] x86/hpet: Consolidate clockevent functions
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > s/hpet_clkevt_msi_resume
> > > /hpet_clkevt_tick_resume
> > >
> > > ... unless the name variations have some hidden purpose and meaning?
> >
> > Historical but we want to preserve some of the old stuff for sentimental
> > reasons.
>
> The msi_resume naming actually has a real reason as there is also the
> legacy_resume one.
Makes sense!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists