linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Document Macronix raw NAND controller bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF450D351D.F05AB6C7-ON48258427.00335A39-48258427.00338DC1@mxic.com.tw>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:23:06 +0800
From:   masonccyang@...c.com.tw
To:     "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     anders.roxell@...aro.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, christophe.kerello@...com,
        computersforpeace@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, jianxin.pan@...ogic.com, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, liang.yang@...ogic.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, paul@...pouillou.net, paul.burton@...s.com,
        richard@....at, robh+dt@...nel.org, stefan@...er.ch,
        vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Document Macronix raw NAND controller
 bindings

Hi Miquel,

> > > 
> > > > > > +- interrupts: interrupt line connected to this NAND 
controller
> > > > > > +- clock-names: should contain "ps_clk", "send_clk" and 
> > "send_dly_clk"
> > > > > > +- clocks: should contain 3 entries for the "ps_clk", 
"send_clk" 
> > and
> > > > > > +    "send_dly_clk" clocks 
> > > > > 
> > > > > s/entries/phandles/ ? 
> > > > 
> > > > ?
> > > > as I know that kernel views the phandle values as device tree 
> > structure
> > > > information instead of device tree data and thus does not store 
them 
> > as
> > > > properties. 
> > > 
> > > The bindings have nothing to do with the kernel views. They might
> > > actually be merged in a different project, out of the kernel.
> > > 
> > 
> > if patch to phandle, should we also patch driver to of_xxx_phandle()?
> 
> I don't understand your question. <&clk 1> is a phandle, you already
> use phandles, it's just more precise than the word "entries".

Oops, I misunderstood your meaning.

thanks for your interpretation.
best regards,

Mason

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information 
and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be 
reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail 
(and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as 
well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be 
informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is 
prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. 
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================

============================================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================