linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in local node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190628011854.GB19488@lerouge>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:18:55 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in
 local node

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:43:13AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> 
> In real product setup, there will be houseeking cpus in each nodes, it 
> is prefer to do housekeeping from local node, fallback to global online 
> cpumask if failed to find houseeking cpu from local node.
> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

Thanks!