linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 5/8] jump_label, x86: Improve error when we fail expected text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190628103224.716910079@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:21:18 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] jump_label, x86: Improve error when we fail expected text

There is only a single usage site left, remove the function and extend
the print to include more information, like the expected text and the
patch type.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c |   24 +++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -24,17 +24,6 @@ union jump_code_union {
 	} __attribute__((packed));
 };
 
-static void bug_at(unsigned char *ip, int line)
-{
-	/*
-	 * The location is not an op that we were expecting.
-	 * Something went wrong. Crash the box, as something could be
-	 * corrupting the kernel.
-	 */
-	pr_crit("jump_label: Fatal kernel bug, unexpected op at %pS [%p] (%5ph) %d\n", ip, ip, ip, line);
-	BUG();
-}
-
 static void __jump_label_set_jump_code(struct jump_entry *entry,
 				       enum jump_label_type type,
 				       union jump_code_union *code,
@@ -42,6 +31,7 @@ static void __jump_label_set_jump_code(s
 {
 	const unsigned char default_nop[] = { STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP };
 	const unsigned char *ideal_nop = ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5];
+	unsigned char *ip = (void *)jump_entry_code(entry);
 	const void *expect;
 	int line;
 
@@ -57,8 +47,16 @@ static void __jump_label_set_jump_code(s
 		expect = code->code; line = __LINE__;
 	}
 
-	if (memcmp((void *)jump_entry_code(entry), expect, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE))
-		bug_at((void *)jump_entry_code(entry), line);
+	if (memcmp(ip, expect, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE)) {
+		/*
+		 * The location is not an op that we were expecting.
+		 * Something went wrong. Crash the box, as something could be
+		 * corrupting the kernel.
+		 */
+		pr_crit("jump_label: Fatal kernel bug, unexpected op at %pS [%p] (%5ph != %5ph)) line:%d init:%d type:%d\n",
+				ip, ip, ip, expect, line, init, type);
+		BUG();
+	}
 
 	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_NOP)
 		memcpy(code, ideal_nop, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);