lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190628114627.411af7c2@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:46:27 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@...felt.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Remove possible deadlock between
 register_kprobe() and ftrace_run_update_code()

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:54:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:52:32 +0200
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri 2019-06-28 09:32:03, Miroslav Benes wrote:  
> > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Petr Mladek wrote:    
> > > > @@ -2611,12 +2610,10 @@ static void ftrace_run_update_code(int command)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >  
> > > > -	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > > > -
> > > >  	ret = ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare();
> > > >  	FTRACE_WARN_ON(ret);
> > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > -		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +		return ret;    
> > > 
> > > Should be just "return;", because the function is "static void".    
> > 
> > Grr, I usually check compiler warnings but I evidently skipped it
> > in this case :-(
> > 
> > Steven, should I send a fixed/folloup patch or will you just
> > fix it when pushing?
> >   
> 
> I'll fix it up.

Also note, this would have been caught with my test suite, as it checks
for any new warnings.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ