linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:29:22 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, jbroadus@...il.com,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> This series attempts to align as much IRQ handling into the
> probe path as possible. Note that I don't have a great setup
> for testing these patches so they are mostly just build tested
> and need careful review and testing before any of them are
> merged.
> 
> The series brings the ACPI path inline with the way the device
> tree path handles the IRQ entirely at probe time. However,
> it still leaves any IRQ specified through the board_info as
> being handled at device time. In that case we need to cache
> something from the board_info until probe time, which leaves
> any alternative solution with something basically the same as
> the current handling although perhaps caching more stuff.

Ehrm, I somehow lost the cover-letter from v8, so I am replying here.
Sorry for the noise.

So, since all patches have the review from Mika and Andy (thanks!), I
applied v8 now to for-next. I had a glimpse, too, and thought it was
ready to go. But I didn't really review myself, I trust you guys. Thank
you, Charles, for your efforts working on this one!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)