[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906290959400.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:01:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>
cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
megha.dey@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 RESEND 3/6] x86: Introduce the dynamic teardown
function
Megha,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Megha Dey wrote:
>
> +void default_teardown_msi_irqs_grp(struct pci_dev *dev, int group_id)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct msi_desc *entry;
> +
> + for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
> + if (entry->group_id == group_id && entry->irq) {
> + for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++)
> + arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq + i);
With proper group management this whole group_id muck goes away. You hand
in a group and clean it up and if done right then you don't need a new
interface at all simply because everything is group based.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists