[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190630040522.GA1263@builder>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:05:22 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: stm32: implement the relax() ops
On Thu 07 Mar 07:42 PST 2019, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
> Implement this optional ops, called by hwspinlock core while spinning on
> a lock, between two successive invocations of trylock().
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
Applied
Thanks,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
> index 4418392..c8eacf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -42,9 +43,15 @@ static void stm32_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> writel(STM32_MUTEX_COREID, lock_addr);
> }
>
> +static void stm32_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + ndelay(50);
> +}
> +
> static const struct hwspinlock_ops stm32_hwspinlock_ops = {
> .trylock = stm32_hwspinlock_trylock,
> .unlock = stm32_hwspinlock_unlock,
> + .relax = stm32_hwspinlock_relax,
> };
>
> static int stm32_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists