lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0f3ac8b-541a-d3d0-e25e-26da11e29748@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jun 2019 16:12:44 +0200
From:   Tobias Nießen 
        <tobias.niessen@...d.uni-hannover.de>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Sabrina Gaube <sabrina-gaube@....de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rts5208: Rewrite redundant if statement to
 improve code style

Am 26.06.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> Both these patches seem fine.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Tobias Nießen wrote:
>> This commit uses the fact that
>>
>>     if (a) {
>>             if (b) {
>>                     ...
>>             }
>>     }
>>
>> can instead be written as
>>
>>     if (a && b) {
>>             ...
>>     }
>>
>> without any change in behavior, allowing to decrease the indentation
>> of the contained code block and thus reducing the average line length.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tobias Nießen <tobias.niessen@...d.uni-hannover.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Gaube <sabrina-gaube@....de>
> 
> Signed-off-by is like signing a legal document that you didn't put any
> of SCO's secret UNIXWARE source code into your patch or do other illegal
> activities.  Everyone who handles a patch is supposed to Sign it.
> 
> It's weird to see Sabrina randomly signing your patches.  Probably there
> is a more appropriate kind of tag to use as well or instead such as
> Co-Developed-by, Reviewed-by or Suggested-by.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Thank you, Dan. This patch series is a mandatory part of a course Sabrina and I are taking at university. We were told to add Signed-off-by for both of us. I can add Co-Developed-by if that helps? Or should she just verify via email that she did indeed sign off?

Regards,
Tobias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ