linux-kernel - [PATCH V5 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reuse refresh_frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  1 Jul 2019 16:56:14 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Qais.Yousef@....com, mka@...omium.org, juri.lelli@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reuse refresh_frequency_limits()

The implementation of intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is quite similar to
refresh_frequency_limits(), lets reuse it.

Finding minimum of policy->user_policy.max and policy->cpuinfo.max_freq
in intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is redundant as cpufreq_set_policy()
will call the ->verify() callback of intel-pstate driver, which will do
this comparison anyway and so dropping it from
intel_pstate_update_max_freq() doesn't harm.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      | 3 ++-
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 7 +------
 include/linux/cpufreq.h        | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 81117e4d43cc..091789e868ee 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
 
@@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ static void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refresh_frequency_limits);
 
 static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index f2ff5de988c1..cc27d4c59dca 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -898,7 +898,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_policies(void)
 static void intel_pstate_update_max_freq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_acquire(cpu);
-	struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
 	struct cpudata *cpudata;
 
 	if (!policy)
@@ -908,11 +907,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_max_freq(unsigned int cpu)
 	policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = global.turbo_disabled_mf ?
 			cpudata->pstate.max_freq : cpudata->pstate.turbo_freq;
 
-	memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
-	new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
-	new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
-
-	cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+	refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
 
 	cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 95425941f46d..1fa37b675a80 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ void cpufreq_cpu_release(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu);
 int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		       struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy);
+void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
 void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu);
 bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
-- 
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b