| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:37:15 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
Hi all,
After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:11:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function 'intel_pstate_update_max_freq':
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:819:22: note: in definition of macro '__typecheck'
(!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:843:24: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:827:48: note: in definition of macro '__is_constexpr'
(sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:833:25: note: in expansion of macro '__no_side_effects'
(__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:843:24: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:835:27: note: in definition of macro '__cmp'
#define __cmp(x, y, op) ((x) op (y) ? (x) : (y))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:835:40: note: in definition of macro '__cmp'
#define __cmp(x, y, op) ((x) op (y) ? (x) : (y))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:838:10: note: in definition of macro '__cmp_once'
typeof(x) unique_x = (x); \
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:838:25: note: in definition of macro '__cmp_once'
typeof(x) unique_x = (x); \
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
include/linux/kernel.h:843:2: error: first argument to '__builtin_choose_expr' not a constant
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:912:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.max = min(policy->user_policy.max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:819:22: note: in definition of macro '__typecheck'
(!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:843:24: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:827:48: note: in definition of macro '__is_constexpr'
(sizeof(int) == sizeof(*(8 ? ((void *)((long)(x) * 0l)) : (int *)8)))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:833:25: note: in expansion of macro '__no_side_effects'
(__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:843:24: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:835:27: note: in definition of macro '__cmp'
#define __cmp(x, y, op) ((x) op (y) ? (x) : (y))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:835:40: note: in definition of macro '__cmp'
#define __cmp(x, y, op) ((x) op (y) ? (x) : (y))
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:838:10: note: in definition of macro '__cmp_once'
typeof(x) unique_x = (x); \
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:31: error: 'struct cpufreq_policy' has no member named 'user_policy'; did you mean 'last_policy'?
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:838:25: note: in definition of macro '__cmp_once'
typeof(x) unique_x = (x); \
^
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
include/linux/kernel.h:843:2: error: first argument to '__builtin_choose_expr' not a constant
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:852:19: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
#define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:913:19: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
new_policy.min = min(policy->user_policy.min, new_policy.max);
^~~
Caused by commit
218208538ffe ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints")
from the pm tree interacting with commit
9083e4986124 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Update max frequency on global turbo changes")
from Linus' tree.
I have used the pm tree from next-20190628 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists