linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/x86: fix spelling mistake "FAILT" -> "FAIL"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5D1A06CE.6000405@bfs.de>
Date:   Mon, 01 Jul 2019 15:12:46 +0200
From:   walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
CC:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] selftests/x86: fix spelling mistake "FAILT" ->
 "FAIL"



Am 01.07.2019 15:04, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> There is an spelling mistake in an a test error message. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> index 4602326b8f5b..a4f4d4cf22c3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int test_vsys_x(void)
>  		printf("[OK]\tExecuting the vsyscall page failed: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>  		       segv_err);
>  	} else {
> -		printf("[FAILT]\tExecution failed with the wrong error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
> +		printf("[FAIL]\tExecution failed with the wrong error: #PF(0x%lx)\n",
>  		       segv_err);
>  		return 1;
>  	}


"wrong error" sounds like scratching table, perhaps "error" is here sufficient ?
Bomus points when user is expected to report this.

re,
 wh