linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Expose resume result via debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14282971-65b1-f7db-26b9-d33636054ba6@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:41:19 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
Cc:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: Expose resume result via debugfs



On 1/7/19 8:01, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> 
>> Hi Evan, Lee,
>>
>> Missatge de Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org> del dia dj., 27 de juny
>> 2019 a les 22:46:
>>>
>>> For ECs that support it, the EC returns the number of slp_s0
>>> transitions and whether or not there was a timeout in the resume
>>> response. Expose the last resume result to usermode via debugfs so
>>> that usermode can detect and report S0ix timeouts.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>>
>> Lee, actually this patch depends on some patches from chrome-platform
>> to apply cleanly. Once is fine with you and if you're happy to have
>> this merged for 5.3, I can just carry the patch with me, shouldn't be
>> any conflicts with your current changes or if you prefer I can create
>> an immutable branch for you.
> 
> I won't be taking any more patches this cycle, so if you're sure that
> it does not conflict, there is no need for an immutable branch.
> 
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 

Thanks Lee.

I think the patch is simple enough, I queued for the autobuilders to play with,
and if all goes well I'll add for 5.3 via chrome-platform.

Thanks,
~ Enric