linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: tlc591xx: Use the OF version of the LED registration function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <102194fe-e4d1-fa36-16f7-2a933e646bb5@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 10:36:34 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...com>,
        <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: tlc591xx: Use the OF version of the LED
 registration function

JJ

On 7/1/19 10:26 AM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> The driver parses the device-tree to identify which LED should be handled.
> Since the information about the device node is known at this time, we can
> provide the LED core with it. It may be useful later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...com>
> ---
>   drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
> index 14e47ff44df5..6a2936c94b73 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ tlc591xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>   		led->led_no = idx++;
>   		led->ldev.brightness_set_blocking = tlc591xx_brightness_set;
>   		led->ldev.max_brightness = LED_FULL;
> -		err = devm_led_classdev_register(dev, &led->ldev);
> +		err = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, child, &led->ldev);
>   		if (err < 0) {
>   			dev_err(dev, "couldn't register LED %s\n",
>   				led->ldev.name);


Reviewed-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>