lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:09:33 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Perf framework : Cluster based counter support


On 6/28/2019 10:29 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:23:10PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> Hi All,
> Hi Mukesh,
>
>> Is it looks considerable to add cluster based event support to add in
>> current perf event framework and later in userspace perf to support
>> such events ?
> Could you elaborate on what you mean by "cluster based event"?
>
> I assume you mean something like events for a cluster-affine shared
> resource like some level of cache?
>
> If so, there's a standard pattern for supporting such system/uncore
> PMUs, see drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c and friends for examples.


Thanks Mark for pointing it out.
Also What is stopping us in adding cluster based event e.g L2 cache 
hit/miss or some other type raw eventsĀ  in core framework ?


Thanks.
Mukesh






>
> Thanks,
> Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ