[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGnkfhx9F1G8K6PjBdUnkCO07GR=ktWAnqOLTcOvg7VGwWb69Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:13:32 +0200
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: don't set IPv6 only flags to IPv4 addresses
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:10 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 18:08 +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > Avoid the situation where an IPV6 only flag is applied to an IPv4 address:
> []
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> []
> > @@ -468,6 +473,9 @@ static int __inet_insert_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> > ifa->ifa_flags &= ~IFA_F_SECONDARY;
> > last_primary = &in_dev->ifa_list;
> >
> > + /* Don't set IPv6 only flags to IPv6 addresses */
>
> umm, IPv4 addresses?
>
>
Ouch, right.
/* Don't set IPv6 only flags to IPv4 addresses */
Can this be edidet on patchwork instead of spamming with a v2?
--
Matteo Croce
per aspera ad upstream
Powered by blists - more mailing lists