[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190701162017.GB2640@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 19:20:17 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans De Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Robert R. Howell" <RHowell@...o.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: PCI/ACPI: Hibernation handling fixes
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:42:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series of patches addresses a few issues related to the handling of
> hibernation in the PCI bus type and the ACPI PM domain and ACPI LPSS driver.
>
> The v2 addresses Hans' concerns regarding the LPSS changes.
>
> First of all, all of the runtime-suspended PCI devices and devices in the ACPI PM and LPSS
> PM domains will be resumed during hibernation (first patch). This appears to be the
> only way to avoid weird corner cases and the benefit from avoiding to resume those
> devices during hibernation is questionable.
>
> That change allows the the hibernation callbacks in all of the involved subsystems to be
> simplified (patches 2 and 3).
>
> Moreover, reusing bus-level suspend callbacks for the "poweroff" transition during
> hibernation (which is the case for the ACPI PM domain and LPSS) is incorrect, so patch 4
> fixes that.
>
> Finally, there are some leftover items in linux/acpi.h that can be dropped (patch 5).
For the whole series,
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists