[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0725b9aa-0523-daef-b4ff-7e2dd910cf3c@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:54:47 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Pankaj Suryawanshi <pankajssuryawanshi@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: DMA-API attr - DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
On 01/07/2019 18:47, Pankaj Suryawanshi wrote:
>> If you want a kernel mapping, *don't* explicitly request not to have a
>> kernel mapping in the first place. It's that simple.
>>
>
> Do you mean do not use dma-api ? because if i used dma-api it will give you
> mapped virtual address.
> or i have to use directly cma_alloc() in my driver. // if i used this
> approach i need to reserved more vmalloc area.
No, I mean just call dma_alloc_attrs() normally *without* adding the
DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING flag. That flag means "I never ever want to
make CPU accesses to this buffer from the kernel" - that is clearly not
the case for your code, so it is utterly nonsensical to still pass the
flag but try to hack around it later.
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists