[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907011959410.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:01:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 2/6] genirq: Fix misleading synchronize_irq()
documentation
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The function might sleep, so it cannot be called from interrupt
> > context. Not even with care.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > ---
> > kernel/irq/manage.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> > @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_hardirq);
> > * to complete before returning. If you use this function while
> > * holding a resource the IRQ handler may need you will deadlock.
> > *
> > - * This function may be called - with care - from IRQ context.
> > + * Can only be called from preemptible code as it might sleep when
> > + * an interrupt thread is associated to @irq.
> > */
> > void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
> > {
>
> + might_sleep();
>
> ?
....
wait_event()
might_sleep() ...
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists