[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f31cb3c576bdbd89665614582af66d04ece8f29.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:51:42 +0000
From: Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>
To: "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"jeremy.linton@....com" <jeremy.linton@....com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"morten.rasmussen@....com" <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
"ottosabart@...erm.com" <ottosabart@...erm.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"johan@...nel.org" <johan@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:44 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Atish
>
> Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off-by:. Can
> I add
> those?
>
Sure.
Is it a common practice to add "Signed-off-by:" the sender even if the
sender has not touched the patch at all?
Regards,
Atish
>
> - Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists