[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daaf6f4e6512402bd8b6fcefc3dba9c045921b38.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:18:44 +0000
From: Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>
To: "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
CC: "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"morten.rasmussen@....com" <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
"ottosabart@...erm.com" <ottosabart@...erm.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"jeremy.linton@....com" <jeremy.linton@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"johan@...nel.org" <johan@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:55 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Atish Patra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 11:44 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > > Looks like patches 1, 6, and 7 are missing your Signed-off-
> > > by:. Can I
> > > add those?
> > >
> > Sure.
> >
> > Is it a common practice to add "Signed-off-by:" the sender even if
> > the
> > sender has not touched the patch at all?
>
> Yes, see section 11(c) here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#n418
>
> The main factor here is that you collected and resent the patches -
> thus
> you're in the patch submission chain.
>
Ahh okay. Thanks for the link. I will keep this in mind in future.
Regards,
Atish
>
> - Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists