linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and reintroduce page_pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190702144426.GD4510@khorivan>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:44:27 +0300
From:   Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        grygorii.strashko@...com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and reintroduce
 page_pool_destroy

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 04:31:39PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>
>Jesper recently removed page_pool_destroy() (from driver invocation) and
>moved shutdown and free of page_pool into xdp_rxq_info_unreg(), in-order to
>handle in-flight packets/pages. This created an asymmetry in drivers
>create/destroy pairs.
>
>This patch add page_pool user refcnt and reintroduce page_pool_destroy.
>This serves two purposes, (1) simplify drivers error handling as driver now
>drivers always calls page_pool_destroy() and don't need to track if
>xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() was unsuccessful. (2) allow special cases
>where a single RX-queue (with a single page_pool) provides packets for two
>net_device'es, and thus needs to register the same page_pool twice with two
>xdp_rxq_info structures.

As I tend to use xdp level patch there is no more reason to mention (2) case
here. XDP patch serves it better and can prevent not only obj deletion but also
pool flush, so, this one patch I could better leave only for (1) case.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk