[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190702155316.GJ6757@mini-arch>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 08:53:16 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, sdf@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: cgroup: Fix build error without CONFIG_NET
On 07/02, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_NET is not set, gcc building fails:
>
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `cg_sockopt_func_proto':
> cgroup.c:(.text+0x237e): undefined reference to `bpf_sk_storage_get_proto'
> cgroup.c:(.text+0x2394): undefined reference to `bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto'
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt':
> (.text+0x2a1f): undefined reference to `lock_sock_nested'
> (.text+0x2ca2): undefined reference to `release_sock'
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.o: In function `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt':
> (.text+0x3006): undefined reference to `lock_sock_nested'
> (.text+0x32bb): undefined reference to `release_sock'
>
> Add CONFIG_NET dependency to fix this.
Can you share the config? Do I understand correctly that you have
CONFIG_NET=n and CONFIG_BPF=y? What parts of BPF do you expect to
work in this case?
Less invasive fix would be something along the lines:
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index 76fa0076f20d..0a00eaca6fae 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -939,6 +939,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sysctl(struct ctl_table_header *head,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sysctl);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET
static bool __cgroup_bpf_prog_array_is_empty(struct cgroup *cgrp,
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type)
{
@@ -1120,6 +1121,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt);
+#endif
static ssize_t sysctl_cpy_dir(const struct ctl_dir *dir, char **bufp,
size_t *lenp)
@@ -1386,10 +1388,12 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *
cg_sockopt_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
switch (func_id) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET
case BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get:
return &bpf_sk_storage_get_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_delete:
return &bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
case BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock:
return &bpf_tcp_sock_proto;
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index e2e51b5..341cf2a 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -998,6 +998,7 @@ config CGROUP_PERF
> config CGROUP_BPF
> bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to cgroups"
> depends on BPF_SYSCALL
> + depends on NET
> select SOCK_CGROUP_DATA
> help
> Allow attaching eBPF programs to a cgroup using the bpf(2)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists