[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703171623.GD24672@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:16:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
raven@...maw.net, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] Add a general, global device notification watch list
[ver #5]
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 04:49:30PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Create a general, global watch list that can be used for the posting of
> device notification events, for such things as device attachment,
> detachment and errors on sources such as block devices and USB devices.
> This can be enabled with:
>
> CONFIG_DEVICE_NOTIFICATIONS
>
> To add a watch on this list, an event queue must be created and configured:
>
> fd = open("/dev/event_queue", O_RDWR);
> ioctl(fd, IOC_WATCH_QUEUE_SET_SIZE, page_size << n);
>
> and then a watch can be placed upon it using a system call:
>
> watch_devices(fd, 12, 0);
>
> Unless the application wants to receive all events, it should employ
> appropriate filters.
What "filter"? Who is going to use this and why a new system call for
this? You can do this today with udev/netlink/hotplug/whatever so why
create yet-another-way?
I don't think this is a good idea unless we really nail down the api and
who is going to be using it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists