lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2807E5FD2F6FDA4886F6618EAC48510E79DEA747@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 22:45:34 +0000
From:   "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: dev_pagemap related cleanups v4

> 
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > And I've demonstrated that I can't send patch series..  While this has
> > all the right patches, it also has the extra patches already in the
> > hmm tree, and four extra patches I wanted to send once this series is
> > merged.  I'll give up for now, please use the git url for anything
> > serious, as it contains the right thing.
> 
> Okay, I sorted it all out and temporarily put it here:
> 
> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/hmm
> 
> Bit involved job:
> - Took Ira's v4 patch into hmm.git and confirmed it matches what
>   Andrew has in linux-next after all the fixups

Looking at the final branch seems good.

Ira

> - Checked your github v4 and the v3 that hit the mailing list were
>   substantially similar (I never did get a clean v4) and largely
>   went with the github version
> - Based CH's v4 series on -rc7 and put back the removal hunk in swap.c
>   so it compiles
> - Merge'd CH's series to hmm.git and fixed all the conflicts with Ira
>   and Ralph's patches (such that swap.c remains unchanged)
> - Added Dan's ack's and tested-by's
> 
> I think this fairly closely follows what was posted to the mailing list.
> 
> As it was more than a simple 'git am', I'll let it sit on github until I hear OK's
> then I'll move it to kernel.org's hmm.git and it will hit linux-next. 0-day
> should also run on this whole thing from my github.
> 
> What I know is outstanding:
>  - The conflicting ARM patches, I understand Andrew will handle these
>    post-linux-next
>  - The conflict with AMD GPU in -next, I am waiting to hear from AMD
> 
> Otherwise I think we are done with hmm.git for this cycle.
> 
> Unfortunately this is still not enough to progress rdma's ODP, so we will need
> to do this again next cycle :( I'll be working on patches once I get all the
> merge window prep I have to do done.
> 
> Regards,
> Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ