[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190702210400.GA14593@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:04:01 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Fix calculation overflow in __finalise_sg()
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On reflection, I don't really think that size_t fits here anyway, since
> all the members of the incoming struct scatterlist are unsigned int too.
> Does the patch below work?
Yes.
> ----->8-----
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Handle SG length overflow better
>
> Since scatterlist dimensions are all unsigned ints, in the relatively
> rare cases where a device's max_segment_size is set to UINT_MAX, then
> the "cur_len + s_length <= max_len" check in __finalise_sg() will always
> return true. As a result, the corner case of such a device mapping an
> excessively large scatterlist which is mergeable to or beyond a total
> length of 4GB can lead to overflow and a bogus truncated dma_length in
> the resulting segment.
>
> As we already assume that any single segment must be no longer than
> max_len to begin with, this can easily be addressed by reshuffling the
> comparison.
>
> Fixes: 809eac54cdd6 ("iommu/dma: Implement scatterlist segment merging")
> Reported-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Thank you!
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 129c4badf9ae..8de6cf623362 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static int __finalise_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> * - and wouldn't make the resulting output segment too long
> */
> if (cur_len && !s_iova_off && (dma_addr & seg_mask) &&
> - (cur_len + s_length <= max_len)) {
> + (max_len - cur_len >= s_length)) {
> /* ...then concatenate it with the previous one */
> cur_len += s_length;
> } else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists