| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190703193035.xsbdspgeiwzoo7aa@pc636>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:30:35 +0200
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Pengfei Li <lpf.vector@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, urezki@...il.com,
rpenyaev@...e.de, mhocko@...e.com, guro@...com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, rppt@...ux.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/vmalloc.c: improve readability and rewrite
vmap_area
Hello, Li.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * patch 3: Rename __find_vmap_area to __search_va_in_busy_tree
> instead of __search_va_from_busy_tree.
> * patch 5: Add motivation and necessary test data to the commit
> message.
> * patch 5: Let va->flags use only some low bits of va_start
> instead of completely overwriting va_start.
>
>
> The current implementation of struct vmap_area wasted space. At the
> determined stage, not all members of the structure will be used.
>
> For this problem, this commit places multiple structural members that
> are not being used at the same time into a union to reduce the size
> of the structure.
>
> And local test results show that this commit will not hurt performance.
>
> After applying this commit, sizeof(struct vmap_area) has been reduced
> from 11 words to 8 words.
>
> Pengfei Li (5):
> mm/vmalloc.c: Introduce a wrapper function of insert_vmap_area()
> mm/vmalloc.c: Introduce a wrapper function of
> insert_vmap_area_augment()
> mm/vmalloc.c: Rename function __find_vmap_area() for readability
> mm/vmalloc.c: Modify function merge_or_add_vmap_area() for readability
> mm/vmalloc.c: Rewrite struct vmap_area to reduce its size
>
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 28 +++++---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
I do not think that it is worth to reduce the struct size the way
this series does. I mean the union around flags/va_start. Simply saying
if we need two variables: flags and va_start let's have them. Otherwise
everybody has to think what he/she access at certain moment of time.
So it would be easier to make mistakes, also that conversion looks strange
to me. That is IMHO.
If we want to reduce the size to L1-cache-line(64 bytes), i would propose to
eliminate the "flags" variable from the structure. We could do that if apply
below patch(as an example) on top of https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/3/661:
<snip>
diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 51e131245379..49bb82863d5b 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -51,15 +51,22 @@ struct vmap_area {
unsigned long va_start;
unsigned long va_end;
- /*
- * Largest available free size in subtree.
- */
- unsigned long subtree_max_size;
- unsigned long flags;
struct rb_node rb_node; /* address sorted rbtree */
struct list_head list; /* address sorted list */
- struct llist_node purge_list; /* "lazy purge" list */
- struct vm_struct *vm;
+
+ /*
+ * Below three variables can be packed, because vmap_area
+ * object can be only in one of the three different states:
+ *
+ * - when an object is in "free" tree only;
+ * - when an object is in "purge list" only;
+ * - when an object is in "busy" tree only.
+ */
+ union {
+ unsigned long subtree_max_size;
+ struct llist_node purge_list;
+ struct vm_struct *vm;
+ };
};
/*
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 6f1b6a188227..e389a6db222b 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -329,8 +329,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
#define DEBUG_AUGMENT_PROPAGATE_CHECK 0
#define DEBUG_AUGMENT_LOWEST_MATCH_CHECK 0
-#define VM_VM_AREA 0x04
-
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmap_area_lock);
/* Export for kexec only */
LIST_HEAD(vmap_area_list);
@@ -1108,7 +1106,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
va->va_start = addr;
va->va_end = addr + size;
- va->flags = 0;
+ va->vm = NULL;
insert_vmap_area(va, &vmap_area_root, &vmap_area_list);
spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
@@ -1912,7 +1910,6 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!va))
continue;
- va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
va->vm = tmp;
@@ -2010,7 +2007,6 @@ static void setup_vmalloc_vm(struct vm_struct *vm, struct vmap_area *va,
vm->size = va->va_end - va->va_start;
vm->caller = caller;
va->vm = vm;
- va->flags |= VM_VM_AREA;
spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
}
@@ -2115,7 +2111,7 @@ struct vm_struct *find_vm_area(const void *addr)
struct vmap_area *va;
va = find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
- if (va && va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)
+ if (va && va->vm)
return va->vm;
return NULL;
@@ -2139,11 +2135,10 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
- if (va && va->flags & VM_VM_AREA) {
+ if (va && va->vm) {
struct vm_struct *vm = va->vm;
va->vm = NULL;
- va->flags &= ~VM_VM_AREA;
spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
kasan_free_shadow(vm);
@@ -2854,7 +2849,7 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count)
if (!count)
break;
- if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA))
+ if (!va->vm)
continue;
vm = va->vm;
@@ -2934,7 +2929,7 @@ long vwrite(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count)
if (!count)
break;
- if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA))
+ if (!va->vm)
continue;
vm = va->vm;
@@ -3464,10 +3459,10 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
va = list_entry(p, struct vmap_area, list);
/*
- * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !VM_VM_AREA on
- * behalf of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
+ * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !vm on behalf
+ * of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
*/
- if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)) {
+ if (!va->vm) {
seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
va->va_end - va->va_start);
<snip>
urezki@...36:~/data/ssd/coding/linux-stable$ pahole -C vmap_area mm/vmalloc.o
die__process_function: tag not supported (INVALID)!
struct vmap_area {
long unsigned int va_start; /* 0 8 */
long unsigned int va_end; /* 8 8 */
struct rb_node rb_node; /* 16 24 */
struct list_head list; /* 40 16 */
union {
long unsigned int subtree_max_size; /* 8 */
struct llist_node purge_list; /* 8 */
struct vm_struct * vm; /* 8 */
}; /* 56 8 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
/* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 5 */
};
urezki@...36:~/data/ssd/coding/linux-stable$
--
Vlad Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists