[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703203128.GC10080@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:31:29 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, chetjain@...ibm.com,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: user - prevent operating on larval algorithms
Hi Michal,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 22:30:57 +0800
> Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:17:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Michal Suchanek reported [1] that running the pcrypt_aead01 test from
> > > LTP [2] in a loop and holding Ctrl-C causes a NULL dereference of
> > > alg->cra_users.next in crypto_remove_spawns(), via crypto_del_alg().
> > > The test repeatedly uses CRYPTO_MSG_NEWALG and CRYPTO_MSG_DELALG.
> > >
> > > The crash occurs when the instance that CRYPTO_MSG_DELALG is trying to
> > > unregister isn't a real registered algorithm, but rather is a "test
> > > larval", which is a special "algorithm" added to the algorithms list
> > > while the real algorithm is still being tested. Larvals don't have
> > > initialized cra_users, so that causes the crash. Normally pcrypt_aead01
> > > doesn't trigger this because CRYPTO_MSG_NEWALG waits for the algorithm
> > > to be tested; however, CRYPTO_MSG_NEWALG returns early when interrupted.
> > >
>
> Do you have some way to reproduce this reliably?
>
> I suppose you would have to send a signal to the process for the call
> to get interrupted, right?
>
It reproduced pretty reliably for me with what you suggested. Just typing in
terminal:
while true; do pcrypt_aead01; done
and then holding Ctrl-C.
If I have time I'll try writing an LTP test that specifically reproduces it.
Yes, it would involve sending a signal to a thread or process that's executing
CRYPTO_MSG_NEWALG (unless I find a better way).
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists