linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] vfio/type1: Check reserve region conflict and update iova list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190703143427.2d63c15f@x1.home>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:34:27 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Cc:     <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        <john.garry@...wei.com>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] vfio/type1: Check reserve region conflict and
 update iova list

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:12:44 +0100
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com> wrote:

> This retrieves the reserved regions associated with dev group and
> checks for conflicts with any existing dma mappings. Also update
> the iova list excluding the reserved regions.
> 
> Reserved regions with type IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT_RELAXABLE are
> excluded from above checks as they are considered as directly
> mapped regions which are known to be relaxable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 970d1ec06aed..b6bfdfa16c33 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -1559,6 +1641,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  	phys_addr_t resv_msi_base;
>  	struct iommu_domain_geometry geo;
>  	LIST_HEAD(iova_copy);
> +	LIST_HEAD(group_resv_regions);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> @@ -1644,6 +1727,13 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  		goto out_detach;
>  	}
>  
> +	iommu_get_group_resv_regions(iommu_group, &group_resv_regions);

This can fail and should have an error case.  I assume we'd fail the
group attach on failure.  Thanks,

Alex